HANDWRITING ANALYSIS EXAMPLES

handwriting analysis

Uses handwriting samples to assess compatibility. See HandWritingProfiles.
Graphology is the pseudoscientific “they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. I.e., it’s a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where ‘like begets like.

examples

(example) an item of information that is typical of a class or group; “this patient provides a typical example of the syndrome”; “there is an example on page 10”
A thing characteristic of its kind or illustrating a general rule
A person or thing regarded in terms of their fitness to be imitated or the likelihood of their being imitated
A printed or written problem or exercise designed to illustrate a rule
(example) model: a representative form or pattern; “I profited from his example”
(example) exemplar: something to be imitated; “an exemplar of success”; “a model of clarity”; “he is the very model of a modern major general”

handwriting analysis examples – The Definitive

The Definitive Book of Handwriting Analysis: The Complete Guide to Interpreting Personalities, Detecting Forgeries, and Revealing Brain Activity Through the Science of Graphology

“Marc Seifer new book The Definitive Book of Handwriting Analysis is one of the best written on the subject in the last 10 years!”
–Dr. Robert O’Block, Founder, American College of Forensic Examiners

“The Definitive Book of Handwriting Analysis is a must for all serious students of graphology. Handwriting analysis provides human understanding and this comprehensive, yet easy- to-read, practical guide will surely become a classic.”
–Iris Hatfield, Professional Graphologist, HuVista International

The ability to write by hand is a pinnacle of human achievement. As a form of self-expression, handwriting reflects a person’s thoughts about the self and reveals aspects of a person’s personality.

Written in a step-by-step fashion, The Definitive Book of Handwriting Analysis begins with the history of the field and then teaches you how to analyze any handwriting, starting with objective criteria, including variables such as organization, speed, size, shape, slant, and symbolic features. Then you learn how to combine these variables to create a full personality profile.

There are more than 100 handwriting samples, including those from Paul Newman, Bill Clinton, Marlon Brando, Donald Trump, Sigmund and Anna Freud, Thomas Edison, Osama bin Laden, Jacqueline Kennedy, Bruce Springsteen, Benito Mussolini, Napoleon, Michael Jackson, Robert Redford, Barak Obama, and Charles Darwin.

Part II discusses how handwriting is organized by the brain and includes many examples of the link between handwriting and various illnesses and brain disorders, from dyslexia and epilepsy to stroke and coma. It ends with a discussion of the link between different personality types, their brain organization, and their handwriting.

Part III is an in-depth look at the field of questioned documents, including such topics as free-hand forgeries, tracing, disguised handwriting, and anonymous notes. It features an in-depth discussion of how forgeries are created and how they are detected.

If you are interested in any aspect of this topic, The Definitive Book of Handwriting Analysis is definitely the book you need!

Common Denominators of Good Ambassadors by Karl Gruber (Former Australian Foreign Minister)

Having been both foreign minister and ambassador, I have seen the problem of ambassadorial appointments from the side of both those who make the appointments and those who receive them. I have been in a position to judge when and how ambassadors fall flat on their face, and why some distinguish themselves. I believe there is one common denominator for the performance of superior ambassadors, and that is skill in communication. It is communication of a very special kind, which must be learned, but without the basic aptitude for communication an ambassador cannot be successful in his manifold tasks. Contrary to the traditional image of an ambassador as a highly polished individual who is so circumspect in what he says that it requires a special talent (allegedly found only in other diplomats) to figure out what he is communicating, I have found that plain speaking is an essential ingredient for a diplomat’s success. He must of course be tactful and sometimes artful in the way he communicates, but the message must come through clearly and precisely. Articulateness in explaining, reporting, defending, and discussing information on his country’s position and other matters is, to my mind, essential.

The finest among American ambassadors with whom I have had dealings were Robert Murphy, Charles E. Bohlen, G. Frederick Reinhardt, and Llewellyn E. Thompson. They all had a thorough knowledge of international affairs, they were cosmopolitan and had empathy for the concerns of other countries, and they were not too cautious in the way they explained what was going on and what their country was trying to accomplish. The worst among American diplomats whom I have met – and I would rather not give their names – were those who were exceedingly cautious (not merely circumspect) and who wanted to elicit information without giving anything in return.

For communication among diplomats is a two-way street: one cannot expect to obtain much information unless one is able and willing to convey information. The ambassador with whom everyone wants to talk is the one who is interesting to talk with. This was especially true, I think, of the men whom the United States sent out to foreign countries in the earliest days of the republic, when they were statesmen who had been among the decision makers in their own capital and "men of the world" who moved easily among the decision makers of other countries.

It will be seen from the above that I am not necessarily critical of the custom of the United States to choose some people for ambassadorial positions who are not professional diplomats – but I believe such persons must have unusual stature in order to be successful, they must be well-read, well-spoken, they must have a thorough knowledge of international affairs, and they must be persons of cosmopolitan tastes and attitudes. Provincialism, ethnocentricity, inability to understand nuances in foreign countries, and the belief that one’s own country is the best in everything-these are handicaps which, after a certain age, no amount of training or experience can overcome.

In my own country, which has a relatively small foreign service with only a limited intake of new officers every year, almost every diplomat can expect to become an ambassador. This has its advantages and disadvantages. Among the advantages is that our diplomats need not be afraid that their career will be in ruins if they make a mistake, and that they can consequently be innovative. Among the disadvantages is that there is too little selection of the best people and a consequent tendency on the part of some of our ambassadors to become bureaucratic. Yet excessive competitiveness can also be a liability, as I have seen in the case of diplomats who came from an environment where they had to claw their way to the top: they became competitive also with their peers, both within their service and with their diplomatic colleagues of other countries. Diplomacy requires effective habits of cooperation.

The best ambassadors I have known have been people who, in addition to a thorough knowledge of their own country and the country of their assignment, also have a well-rounded view of the world (Weltbild) into which what was happening could be fitted. Without such a world picture it is virtually impossible to reach a firm conclusion about the significance of developments. Nowadays politics permeates every field of state activity. Any small war anywhere has the potential of leading to a world conflagration. The growing closeness and interdependence of nations and the interaction of their public opinions have had the result that the acid of ideological indoctrination seeps into every cleft of international and internal differences. No wonder that any cool assessment of the moving forces of our times requires increased knowledge, sound judgment, and the ability to attach the proper importance to what is happening in a large variety of fields. A good ambassador must

SPIROGYRA

My 1976 school homework. Spirogyra is a filamentous green thing. (And a progressive rock band from the Canterbury scene.) Example of turquoise ink for Sylvia. Handwriting for analysis.

handwriting analysis examples

Did you ever wonder what your signature says about you? About your boss? Your partner?

This 25-page guide (5,000 words) will teach you how to analyze signatures utilizing 5 easy steps. You will discover what yours (and others!) signatures are saying to the world.

Handwriting analysis, or graphology, is the study of handwriting with the aim of revealing the character and personality of the writer. Also revealed are the writer’s strengths, weaknesses and innate abilities. It can be thought of as “body language” on paper.

One’s signature is the “public face” that they show the world, giving information on how they want to be seen. You don’t have to hire an expert to decode what your signature, (or your bosses) reveals.

**Included in your purchase is access to $29 worth of bonuses:
• Video and analysis of signatures I couldn’t include in this guide
• Downloadable handwriting analysis work sheet with permission to copy
• Special report on FAQ’s

You will be able to apply this knowledge with people that you deal with such as: contractors, health care professionals, attorneys, possible partners, etc. You will gain important, instant insight into whose ever signature you see through utilizing this 5 easy steps process.

Learn with Lisa Schuetz, handwriting expert for more than 25 years.